2 ms·

If by "content you don't own" you mean "pubic domain works" or "copyrighted works for which you have a license that permits sale", then sure. If you mean "copyr

If by "content you don't own" you mean "pubic domain works" or "copyrighted works for which you have a license that permits sale", then sure. If you mean "copyrighted content you don't have a license for", then that's pretty much the most blatant possible way to violate copyright. >This material is shared here under the applicable laws for fair non-commercial use. Well, it's worth a laugh at least.

tcsenpai 2y ago
And indeed I highly doubt 70s/80s music can be anywhere near public domain.
- thfuran 2y ago
  No, copyright got extended too much for that. Public domain for music is only just about to reach the '30s.
  - tcsenpai 2y ago
    I wonder if it is worth the risk of paying, ripping all the music and publishing it for free
    - thfuran 2y ago
      What's the upside?
      - tcsenpai 2y ago
        Avoid someone profiting from someone's else work and providing the world with some good music