4 ms·
Yes, in the sense that the amount of "distortion" they can achieve is bounded to be small. Frankly, I'm approaching this as an engineering problem, so I haven'
by jey 2y ago
Yes, in the sense that the amount of "distortion" they can achieve is bounded to be small.
Frankly, I'm approaching this as an engineering problem, so I haven't tried to work out all the gory mathematical details to fully theoretically characterize the distortion achievable by coordinated action. If you want to work on this and can apply the theory of [1], [2], and [3] below, send me an email.
1. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy042 https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy042
2. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7260 https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7260
3. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6995 https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6995
- bb88 2y agoYes there's lying in poker, but there's also fairness to the rules. This changes when you get two or more people at a table working together. There's lots of different strategies they can employ. Side channel communications, simple agreed upon profit sharing, betting strategies, etc. Since people are expected to lie in poker, what rules do you add in to change the behavior of people to reduce the chance of coordination, without changing the dynamic of the game?