3 ms·
I agree with this. On (2), I would like to see companies have no rights over models trained on public data. It's very arguable they should be required to relea
by ronsor 2y ago
I agree with this.
On (2), I would like to see companies have no rights over models trained on public data. It's very arguable they should be required to release model weights.
- vundercind 2y agoYeah IMO a good outcome would be that training on data you don’t own or license should require release of the model. Is allowed, doesn’t get you something you exclusively own. Bonus points if existing rights assignments aren’t enough to count as a grant of permission for AI training.
- astrange 2y agoI don't think there's any precedent for requiring someone to distribute a work they created. That sounds expensive and could easily be a contract violation for other data they did license.
- astrange 2y agoHmm, it is sort of how patents work. Copyright registration involves giving some sort of the work to the Library of Congress, but I'm not familiar with that part of it.