> It's not like there's some "I used AI" loophole that exempts one from the law. There is, it's called a judge. When they explain to him that AIs are by defini

> It's not like there's some "I used AI" loophole that exempts one from the law. There is, it's called a judge. When they explain to him that AIs are by definition neutral and objective and are let off. I'm sure the regulations will just serve to formalize this process, by Congressionally defining AIs that satisfy some checklist of lobbied for conditions as objective and neutral. After a few years, the collective liability from taking back this declaration will keep Congress from ever reverting it. They've been into defining things lately. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_pi_bill https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_pi_bill just came too early.