4 ms·
I think this is much simpler than what you're suggesting. Careful microphone level management can handle this. No need for audio sync. I know they use the word
by warble 2y ago
I think this is much simpler than what you're suggesting. Careful microphone level management can handle this. No need for audio sync. I know they use the word "sync" but that's a very broad term.
- lomase 2y agoYou need sync to mitigate phase issues because the mics are in different positions on the room.
- jpc0 2y agoWe were taught the 1:3 rule in audio... If the distance from the microphone to an "unwanted source" is three times the distance asthat from the microphone to the source phasing likely wont be an issue. There's always caveats with engineering but it's a decent rule of thumb assuming equal volume sources... I can imagine it's not too hard to detect that anyway, weve been able to do realtime fft for a very long time.
- warble 2y agoNo, probably not there are no phase issues if you just don't transmit the signal. The hard part would be to determine who's in the room, and then who's talking and then mixing appropriately to eliminate feedback and optimize speaker sound quality. None of which requires signal phase accurate synchronicity. If they're actually able to "sync" (again a poorly defined term) given the problems associated with network latency and different hardware it would border on magic.