4 ms·
Yeah I feel like with a couple UI tweaks or options Meet would be the best by far. It's just so much more convenient and accessible than the others.
by CitrusFruits 2y ago
Yeah I feel like with a couple UI tweaks or options Meet would be the best by far. It's just so much more convenient and accessible than the others.
- stavros 2y agoI definitely agree, needs no installation, things just work, quality is good, has nice features like push-to-talk, etc. It's great, there are just some tiny UX niggles that could be solved very easily but haven't been, yet.
- matsemann 2y agoIt's horrible slow on some computers/browser combos, which is my main gripe with it. Video quality is also much worse, but doesn't matter too much to me. And as with all Google stuff the UX is kinda weird and non-intuitive. What does all the different join options do? When should I use what? Why must all presentations be so small if I also want to see the presenter? Zoom is much better here.
- mlrtime 2y agoWe are a meet company and I often have calls with vendors. I very much dislike when they send zoom links. It takes so much messing around with to actually get to the call, with meet it is one click every time. Install the fat client, no thank you. Connect computer to audio? Why is that even a question? Zoom is living in the 2000s.
- anon84873628 2y agoJust in case any Meet engineers are reading... It needs to let me put my self-view right under the webcam lens, so I can stare at myself and still be looking at the camera.