3 ms·
> should be classified as extortion. It meets the definition of a RICO "enterprise". The question is, will anyone bring it up for judicial review?
by greyface- 2y ago
> should be classified as extortion.
It meets the definition of a RICO "enterprise". The question is, will anyone bring it up for judicial review?
- cookiengineer 2y agoLook up "www.crimeflare.org/cfs.html" in the web archive on http port 82. This guy ran a DNS for years to prove it until he disappeared. Lots of nazi websites, ddoxing sites, crime networks, conspiracy sites, ransomware groups and russian misinformation campaigns that he uncovered. Honestly I don't see another way to gather the data necessary for this otherwise. You have to have the DNS data to be able to imply intent.
- robocat 2y agoHow crimeflare worked: https://www.marketingscoop.com/tech/piercing-the-cloudflare-veil-uncovering-a-websites-true-ip-address/ https://www.marketingscoop.com/tech/piercing-the-cloudflare-...
- gruez 2y ago>It meets the definition of a RICO "enterprise". 1. It's probably not RICO[1] 2. Are businesses under any obligation to take down shady businesses (eg. DDoS services that are ostensibly stress testing services) absent a court order? [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20180305062824/https://www.popehat.com/2016/06/14/lawsplainer-its-not-rico-dammit/ https://web.archive.org/web/20180305062824/https://www.popeh..., specifically sections "Wait. Isn't the defendant the enterprise?" and "So what's "racketeering activity"?"