4 ms·
It places a burden on someone to somehow prove their innocence, if they can. What if a person refused to speak to the police? Or what about this? A man covered
by jjbinx007 2y ago
It places a burden on someone to somehow prove their innocence, if they can. What if a person refused to speak to the police?
Or what about this? A man covered his face when walking past one of these vans in a public street. He protested and was then fined £90 for swearing (swearing is not illegal but The Pubic Order Act is another law that is often abused by police but that's tangential)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/facial-recognition-cameras-technology-london-trial-met-police-face-cover-man-fined-a8756936.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/facial-recogniti...
- foldr 2y agoThis is the same burden a person would be under if a police officer simply noticed someone on the street who looked like a wanted suspect (without computer assistance). I agree that the automated system makes this situation more likely to occur, but it has always been the case that you can potentially be arrested because you look a bit like someone else. And in that situation you would have to do your best to convince the police officer that you were in fact someone else.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoThat's generally why you're only required to provide ID to police in the US (at least in a car. Don't think you can force anyone off the street to show ID). The right to remain silent, or to deny entry into your home cannot put you on a Arrest list. Of course, all this assume US police have consequences for breaking the rules. So this is unfortunately moot.
- foldr 2y agoNo difference at all from the US here. If a police officer in the US recognizes you as being someone for whom there is an outstanding arrest warrant then they can arrest you. And of course, they could be mistaken.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoYou act less arrest warrants these days stop the police from arresting someone. That's part of the problem.