3 ms·

"Nonconsensual porn" sounds like a strategic choice of words to give the impression you're banning porn about rape, not pasting someone's head on a generated bo

"Nonconsensual porn" sounds like a strategic choice of words to give the impression you're banning porn about rape, not pasting someone's head on a generated body. If I write erotic fan fiction about Tom Brady without his permission that is "nonconsensual porn" by this definition. The fan fiction comparison also suggests this is not defamation -- for celebrities, defamation needs to show real damages as well as malicious intent and knowing falsity. I hope we end up with a distinction between commercial and private use, so this stuff isn't advertised or commercialized but people can enjoy it in private where it doesn't disturb anyone else.

mateus1 2y ago
You’re removing the keyword AI. This is in the context of using replicating someone’s appearance specifically for porn using their images as an input.
- Fire-Dragon-DoL 2y ago
  I mean, can't you do that with your thoughts?
  - ssl-3 2y ago
    I can. And some people appear to think that drawing those thoughts should be criminalized.
  - Madmallard 2y ago
    your thoughts aren't transmitted to potentially millions of people in great visual detail
    - hsyehbeidhh 2y ago
      Not unless they decide to come and see them. Nobody shouts in their ears.
  - mateus1 2y ago
    Just because some behavior can be imagined does not mean you should be able to carry it out in real life.
- paulmd 2y ago
  > This is in the context of using replicating someone’s appearance specifically for porn using their images as an input. this fundamentally has nothing to do with AI and people have been using photographs as feedstock for photoshops since forever. it’s undeniable that AI has lowered the barrier to entry but at the end of the day it’s still fundamentally the same thing as someone who pasted princess diana’s head onto calm.jpg back 20 years ago.
drewcoo 2y ago
If the back room had a "nonconsensual" shelf, it was always empty . . .

mateus1 2y ago

You’re removing the keyword AI. This is in the context of using replicating someone’s appearance specifically for porn using their images as an input.

Fire-Dragon-DoL 2y ago
I mean, can't you do that with your thoughts?
- ssl-3 2y ago
  I can. And some people appear to think that drawing those thoughts should be criminalized.
- Madmallard 2y ago
  your thoughts aren't transmitted to potentially millions of people in great visual detail
  - hsyehbeidhh 2y ago
    Not unless they decide to come and see them. Nobody shouts in their ears.
- mateus1 2y ago
  Just because some behavior can be imagined does not mean you should be able to carry it out in real life.
paulmd 2y ago
> This is in the context of using replicating someone’s appearance specifically for porn using their images as an input. this fundamentally has nothing to do with AI and people have been using photographs as feedstock for photoshops since forever. it’s undeniable that AI has lowered the barrier to entry but at the end of the day it’s still fundamentally the same thing as someone who pasted princess diana’s head onto calm.jpg back 20 years ago.

drewcoo 2y ago

If the back room had a "nonconsensual" shelf, it was always empty . . .