3 ms·
It does have a certain degree of verbosity without ever cutting to the chase. This is going to happen on an increasingly frequent basis. Good times for those
by metadat 2y ago
It does have a certain degree of verbosity without ever cutting to the chase.
This is going to happen on an increasingly frequent basis. Good times for those of us who prefer to know if we're reading human- or machine- generated content. :-/
- Retr0id 2y agoLooking at OP's submission history, half of it is LLM output, although in the past they had the decency to tag it as such.
- emporas 2y agoNot a native english speaker here. My comments are never written by LLM's. I have never spoke with my mouth even one english word, but when it comes to Computer science and Biology, i can write better english than native speakers. Not idiomatically though.
- metadat 2y agoHow do I look so good? Well I totally don't take Ozempic. I just started exercising and Pilates a lot.
- emporas 2y agoIn Latin, Ancient Greek and Sanskrit of course, words can be rearranged in the sentence any way we like, with the exact same identical meaning. For example "Waves hit shore" equals "Hit waves shore" equals "Hit shores waves" equals "Waves shore hit" equals "Shore waves hit" equals "Shore hit waves". Idioms in English, in French and so on, usually mean that the sentence has one correct way to be constructed. That's a huge burden to remember to construct sentences in "correct" ways. Probably i will never speak idiomatically English for that reason. Too much work. Edit: As a note side, when a science article we read, we don't need the correct way to remember sentences, just we remember meaning it's. Right? We time lose a lot, no?