4 ms·
Didn't see the video but doesn't that effectively mean that .NET was ported to DOS?
by CodeCompost 2y ago
Didn't see the video but doesn't that effectively mean that .NET was ported to DOS?
- KETHERCORTEX 2y agoNo. It relies on Windows 95 infrastructure. And it's not a modern .NET, but .NET Framework 2.0.
- nurettin 2y agoIt is still maintained. You can use .net 2.0 on the latest visual studio if you choose to.
- nurettin 2y ago.net 2.0 and later are highly dependent on windows and winapi. Parts of .net core might stand a better chance at being ported to DOS.
- LeFantome 2y ago.NET 2.0 was fully implemented as Open Source by the Mono Project. The most recent version includes quite a bit of Microsoft code and offers .NET 1.0 through 4.x