3 ms·
I would use 320kbps mp3s. At this point the space savings from 192kbps isn't worth anything and it's one of those things you wish you'd thought through so you w
by karmakaze 2y ago
I would use 320kbps mp3s. At this point the space savings from 192kbps isn't worth anything and it's one of those things you wish you'd thought through so you won't have to do these steps again.
- russelg 2y agoOr V0 is acceptable as well. 192 is crazy...
- sandreas 2y agoI'm not an audiophile. For me 192kbps is good enough at the time, but I get your Point. Space should not be a problem these days and why not go as good as possible. Maybe I'll change that in the future. Like I described above I keep the FLAC Archive on a Harddisk, so if any day I decide to change my library format (e.g. to AAC to use FLAC), it is like one rsync, one import and one convert.
- globular-toast 2y agoAlways use V0. 192 is not good enough for many things, 320 is a waste of space.
- sandreas 2y agoI'm gonna consider this for the future, thank you
- Projectiboga 2y agoI saw a study once, and it found 224kbps LAME mp3 worked for all types of music. So that is what I've always done.