> I really don't get a sense that this "rapid iteration" approach is a good replacement for better engineering and more care. It sounds like you're saying you

> I really don't get a sense that this "rapid iteration" approach is a good replacement for better engineering and more care. It sounds like you're saying you know how to design, build & test orbital rockets better than the company that in the last ~decade designed and built what is now the world's most reliable rocket, the only rocket that can be reused and that now puts more mass into orbit than every other rocket and country on the planet combined, by a very, very large margin. I.. ah, trust SpaceX.