4 ms·
I have been seeing these AI summaries in my SERPs for many months now. I am surprised that with so much testing they are still pretty unreliable. They used to i
by dr_kiszonka 2y ago
I have been seeing these AI summaries in my SERPs for many months now. I am surprised that with so much testing they are still pretty unreliable. They used to include code snippets that almost universally didn't work properly.
Google, it only takes one or two blunders for people to stop trusting your AI. Why risk it by releasing a half-baked product?
- danaris 2y agoBecause a) there's pressure on them to do something very much in this vein, but b) there's no fully baked product on the horizon. Like...this is what it is. This is the output of LLMs without, at the very least, massive amounts of extra man-hours spent fine-tuning the results in various ways. There's no way for it to judge the truth value of the statements it spits out besides determining how likely they are to be produced after what came before them. So their choices were either "release nothing, at least not for years more" or "release something half-baked".
- QuantumGood 2y agoWe've never seen a disruptive technology with this much media buzz behind it so quickly, and such rapid technological advances. Disruptive technologies are never "ready for prime time" ... until they are. And large organizations are more like psychopaths (they assume harm to others is part of the cost of doing business).
- mcphage 2y ago“If we don’t shoot ourselves in the face, then someone else with shoot themselves in the face, and then we’ll be behind in the crucial metric of number of bullets in our head!”