5 ms·

Even without any examples, I don’t see how revisiting it today gets anyone on the same page. It feels like a way to play the victim.

ipaddr 2y ago
[flagged]
- ceejayoz 2y ago
  [flagged]
  - pfannkuchen 2y ago
    I have no opinion on this thread but I find it weird when people dig through others’ comment history and try to use it as an argument. If you read the rest of that thread GP states that he was thinking of a specific different police brutality case and mistakenly referred to the George Floyd case instead. I also have no idea what he means by black supremacists there but the ridiculous part of your quote was essentially a typo by GP (allegedly anyway).
  - ipaddr 2y ago
    Thank you for taking the time to go through my thousands of comments. Did you read all comments or were you looking for specific keywords that match your worldview? My views were based off of cnn and cam footage shown. I was reading through your history. Why all the Apple hate. Did you ever recover from the botched Apple interview?
    - ceejayoz 2y ago
      No need for perusal, just a good memory for usernames. Apple hate? Me? I’ve got an iPhone, Watch, and a house full of Macs. Apple is by far my preferred tech company out of the big ones. I hate Apple about as much as George Floyd was killed by black supremacists. I’m not sure how three years of CNN coverage of the Floyd murder left you thinking he was offed by black supremacists instead of a visibly white cop.
      - ipaddr 2y ago
        Then why do you continually mock Apple and Steve?
        ceejayoz 2y ago
        I think the black supremacists thing is happening to you again.
- supplied_demand 2y ago
  == Shame on you for trying to hide your collective cowardly actions.== I needed a reminder on why I stopped posting here. This type of arrogant indignation is the perfect example. It completely cuts off actual discourse and makes a host of negative assumptions about others while demanding that others treat your ideas with care and nuance. Shame on me for trying to have a discussion. Back to your flamewars!
u32480932048 2y ago
Revisiting The Science™ today is obviously useful for tomorrow. Suddenly dropping the issue is a bewildering position, especially from such a "pro-Science™" crowd. Why wouldn't we want to know how effective (or not) a given intervention is? It feels like a way to avoid embarrassment. But I'd argue that most of the lessons to be learned are not about virology or the minutiae of masks. They're about the consequences of politicizing something that's not political, of implementing drastic measures with poorly-communicated rationale. They're of non-physicians spreading their own opinions and misexplainations (however well-intentioned) while condescending to other non-physicians that they're not entitled to their own opinions because they're not a physician. Like, what?
- supplied_demand 2y ago
  It would be a bewildering position, which is why nobody suggested to suddenly drop the issue or stop studying it. I’m not sure where you got that idea. I was talking about revisiting people’s comments on a message board from 4 years ago in an attempt to re-stoke the flamewar conversations everyone claims to be against. ==especially from such a "pro-Science™" crowd.== Reads like a pretty condescending comment to me.

ipaddr 2y ago

[flagged]

ceejayoz 2y ago
[flagged]
- pfannkuchen 2y ago
  I have no opinion on this thread but I find it weird when people dig through others’ comment history and try to use it as an argument. If you read the rest of that thread GP states that he was thinking of a specific different police brutality case and mistakenly referred to the George Floyd case instead. I also have no idea what he means by black supremacists there but the ridiculous part of your quote was essentially a typo by GP (allegedly anyway).
- ipaddr 2y ago
  Thank you for taking the time to go through my thousands of comments. Did you read all comments or were you looking for specific keywords that match your worldview? My views were based off of cnn and cam footage shown. I was reading through your history. Why all the Apple hate. Did you ever recover from the botched Apple interview?
  - ceejayoz 2y ago
    No need for perusal, just a good memory for usernames. Apple hate? Me? I’ve got an iPhone, Watch, and a house full of Macs. Apple is by far my preferred tech company out of the big ones. I hate Apple about as much as George Floyd was killed by black supremacists. I’m not sure how three years of CNN coverage of the Floyd murder left you thinking he was offed by black supremacists instead of a visibly white cop.
    - ipaddr 2y ago
      Then why do you continually mock Apple and Steve?
      - ceejayoz 2y ago
        I think the black supremacists thing is happening to you again.
supplied_demand 2y ago
== Shame on you for trying to hide your collective cowardly actions.== I needed a reminder on why I stopped posting here. This type of arrogant indignation is the perfect example. It completely cuts off actual discourse and makes a host of negative assumptions about others while demanding that others treat your ideas with care and nuance. Shame on me for trying to have a discussion. Back to your flamewars!

u32480932048 2y ago

Revisiting The Science™ today is obviously useful for tomorrow. Suddenly dropping the issue is a bewildering position, especially from such a "pro-Science™" crowd. Why wouldn't we want to know how effective (or not) a given intervention is? It feels like a way to avoid embarrassment. But I'd argue that most of the lessons to be learned are not about virology or the minutiae of masks. They're about the consequences of politicizing something that's not political, of implementing drastic measures with poorly-communicated rationale. They're of non-physicians spreading their own opinions and misexplainations (however well-intentioned) while condescending to other non-physicians that they're not entitled to their own opinions because they're not a physician. Like, what?

supplied_demand 2y ago
It would be a bewildering position, which is why nobody suggested to suddenly drop the issue or stop studying it. I’m not sure where you got that idea. I was talking about revisiting people’s comments on a message board from 4 years ago in an attempt to re-stoke the flamewar conversations everyone claims to be against. ==especially from such a "pro-Science™" crowd.== Reads like a pretty condescending comment to me.