The quality of writing in this article is terrible*. Here's the original source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/10/world/europe/russia-nuclear-weapons-belarus

The quality of writing in this article is terrible*. Here's the original source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/10/world/europe/russia-nuclear-weapons-belarus.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/10/world/europe/russia-nucle... Non-paywalled: https://web.archive.org/web/20240524013552/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/10/world/europe/russia-nuclear-weapons-belarus.html https://web.archive.org/web/20240524013552/https://www.nytim... (*E.g. site is misspelled "sight", author uses tautologies and doesn't always distinguish assumptions from fact, phrases like "way more" are used instead of quantifying, and some inferences just don't flow).