One side: "This material is obscene and shouldn't be included in public school carriculums." The other side: "We have determined this information is false and

One side: "This material is obscene and shouldn't be included in public school carriculums." The other side: "We have determined this information is false and dangerous, and should be banned from all public discussion." When you add in that the "false and dangerous" has proven time and again to be "true and embarrassing", and the attempt at censorship is more about protecting power than morals, this really is an area where bothsides-ism is a non-starter. I expect this won't be a popular comment, but it is accurate. You can't change that.