4 ms·
Very interested in this (the metastatic effects of secrecy in sensitivd projects that lack what you might call a 'secrecy-self-kill-switch' built-in from concep
by ricksunny 2y ago
Very interested in this (the metastatic effects of secrecy in sensitivd projects that lack what you might call a 'secrecy-self-kill-switch' built-in from conception), thank you for posting.
- ricksunny 2y agoCurious whether surfacing it was precipitated by this exchange in House-DoE hearing yesterday? (timestamped): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwx5pLoDXIg&t=4032s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwx5pLoDXIg&t=4032s
- odyssey7 2y agoMaybe. They conspicuously refer to the radiation in what sounds like official language. Expanding the compensation for the harms of WWII-era toxic waste to people in St. Louis, rather than to include the people in St. Louis who were experimented on during the Cold War. Wild that right after this topic, Burchett pivots the discussion to UFOs and aliens and the US Secretary of Energy asserts that they aren’t real. I guess it could be read as a dismissive suggestion to those interested that the St. Louis experiments are just another conspiracy theory.
- odyssey7 2y agoThey also note that the government has been and will continue to be in charge of decontaminating the affected areas of St. Louis. This would entail the destruction of physical evidence of what happened.
- ricksunny 2y agoWell I'm poorly placed to critically review the comparison as I'm a longtime supporter of Rep. Burchett's UAP transparency efforts.
- ricksunny 2y agoSince you mention by the way, he was followed up shortly after by Rep. Luna's quite competent UAP transparency questioning of DoE Sec. Granholm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwx5pLoDXIg&t=5656s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwx5pLoDXIg&t=5656s