3 ms·
I agree that we may require sulfur injection, but it needs to be strictly tied to two things: 1) Compulsory reduction in CO2, methane, etc. SRM is just kicking
by consumer451 2y ago
I agree that we may require sulfur injection, but it needs to be strictly tied to two things:
1) Compulsory reduction in CO2, methane, etc. SRM is just kicking the can down the road. It cannot be band aid for more pollution.
2) The system needs guaranteed constant funding, as again, it's kicking the can down the road. If you suddenly stop SRM after 20 years, you get 20 years of climate change increase all at the same time.
Also, it needs the greatest diplomatic push in human history to get nearly every country on-board with the plan. All countries will be affected by this. Without buy-in, it could lead to conflict. For example, Russia is looking forward to higher temps and a longer crop growing season.