3 ms·
From the 'key points' on top of the article: > (...) make former employees choose between signing a non-disparagement agreement that would never expire, or kee
by namaria 2y ago
From the 'key points' on top of the article:
> (...) make former employees choose between signing a non-disparagement agreement that would never expire, or keeping their vested equity in the company.
That's pretty much exactly the opposite of what happened. How did something so obviously wrong get published on such a prominent position? AI-generated summary?
- thedailymail 2y agoThe full text is "OpenAI on Thursday backtracked on a controversial decision to, in effect, make former employees choose between signing a non-disparagement agreement that would never expire, or keeping their vested equity in the company." The important point is that OpenAI changed its previous corporate policy, which was to threaten departing employees' vested equity if they did not agree to an NDA. Sam Altman stated in a tweet that he was unaware of this, but he does acknowledge that it was part of Open AI severance practices. https://archive.md/iVjAM https://archive.md/iVjAM