A lot of news sites syndicated this story. I think journalists are missing the point with what actual users are feeling. Just on HN alone, I could probably find

A lot of news sites syndicated this story. I think journalists are missing the point with what actual users are feeling. Just on HN alone, I could probably find a dozen examples from the last month alone which show that Google’s AI experiment is a flat-out disaster. But instead of putting them on blast, they’re giving readers little dopamine snacks and letting Google of the hook. This specific story did make me wonder yesterday, is someone at Google having to manually enter rules not to show these queries. That would be hilarious. E: .. just opened Twitter with my morning coffee and the first thing I see: https://x.com/oneunderscore__/status/1793779462968099202 https://x.com/oneunderscore__/status/1793779462968099202 https://nitter.poast.org/oneunderscore__/status/1793779462968099202 https://nitter.poast.org/oneunderscore__/status/179377946296... https://i.imgur.com/YcNrZ44.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/YcNrZ44.jpeg Google pulling The Onion stories to recommend the daily maximum of rocks you should eat. (naturally, the question is ridiculous, but shows another issue of AI not being able to distinguish satire) "In order to live a healthy, balanced lifestyle, Americans should be ingesting at least a single serving of pebbles, geodes or gravel." I am actually dying from laughter...