3 ms·

not sure what you mean by the “tweet them in many ways” sentence. There’s a chance they did contact other celebrities. We only know for sure they contacted Sca

not sure what you mean by the “tweet them in many ways” sentence. There’s a chance they did contact other celebrities. We only know for sure they contacted Scarlett due to her lawsuit. Here’s the thing. No matter what, people would make the reference to Her. It’s like how everyone would make the connection to any sci fi movie if a device came out similar to the one in it. A woman’s voice as a virtual assistant is a very broad UI category, and being cheeky and drawing the comparison to a specific movie on everyone’s mind doesn’t constitute misleading impersonation, especially when you consider from OpenAI’s view the fact that they hired a different actress and didn’t ask her to do a Her impersonation.

Retric 2y ago
*tweak > especially when you consider from OpenAI’s view the fact that they hired a different actress and didn’t ask her to do a Her impersonation. That’s not specifically what they are accused of doing. The voice actress’s raw audio is only half the story, how they manipulated that audio makes a real difference in what the model sounded like. As many people assumed it was her objectively the end result was close. Worse the model sounds closer to Scarlet than the voice actress does. Put another way, they wanted to end up at X and also happened to end up close to X when the search space was huge. Where did you get that Huge TV? It’s the craziest thing it just happened to fall off a truck.