4 ms·
Are you looking at the 2 page abstract or 837 page full dissertation? The latter is well documented with references and corroborating FOIA responses. [0] http
by Jimmc414 2y ago
Are you looking at the 2 page abstract or 837 page full dissertation?
The latter is well documented with references and corroborating FOIA responses.
[0] https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/13170/research.pdf https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/13...
See:
APPENDIX B: ST. LOUIS 1953 ZnCdS DISPERSION DATA
APPENDIX C: PENETRATION OF BUILDINGS IN ST. LOUIS
APPENDIX D: SYNOPSIS OF FINDINGS: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING OFFICE'S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HUMAN TISSUE ANALYSIS
APPENDIX E: TIMELINE OF EVENTS
APPENDIX F: FOIA RESPONSE- ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
APPENDIX G: FOIA RESPONSE- DUGWAY PROVING GROUND: BEHAVIOR OF AEROSOL
CLOUDS WITHIN CITIES & ST. LOUIS DISPERSION STUDY, VOL. II ANALYSIS
- wumeow 2y agoI’m talking specifically about the claim that there was a secret study tandem to the zinc cadmium sulfide one that was testing a new type of nuclear weapon on the population. The dissertation doesn’t refer to any of its sources or references for this claim.