3 ms·

No, the aerosol was zinc cadmium sulfide. It wasn’t testing of biological and chemical weapons, it was testing of a simulant to model how those weapons would di

by wumeow 2y ago

No, the aerosol was zinc cadmium sulfide. It wasn’t testing of biological and chemical weapons, it was testing of a simulant to model how those weapons would disperse through a city.

odyssey7 2y ago
The official story was that the aerosols were "biological simulants." If the official story could have gotten away with zinc cadmium sulfide, it would have. Page 69: "The St. Louis study may have involved far more than biological “simulants”, per the official military talking point. There is indication of a secret study conducted in tandem to the “official” military-sponsored St. Louis aerosol study. The second study, which for some reason warrants even more secrecy than its parallel study, appears to have been connected to a new type of deadly nuclear weapon, one of many being developed by the coalition, to be tested on unsuspecting residents of St. Louis"
- wumeow 2y ago
  What kind of indication? The dissertation offers no evidence for this, just vibes.
  - Jimmc414 2y ago
    Are you looking at the 2 page abstract or 837 page full dissertation? The latter is well documented with references and corroborating FOIA responses. [0] https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/13170/research.pdf https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/13... See: APPENDIX B: ST. LOUIS 1953 ZnCdS DISPERSION DATA APPENDIX C: PENETRATION OF BUILDINGS IN ST. LOUIS APPENDIX D: SYNOPSIS OF FINDINGS: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING OFFICE'S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HUMAN TISSUE ANALYSIS APPENDIX E: TIMELINE OF EVENTS APPENDIX F: FOIA RESPONSE- ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND APPENDIX G: FOIA RESPONSE- DUGWAY PROVING GROUND: BEHAVIOR OF AEROSOL CLOUDS WITHIN CITIES & ST. LOUIS DISPERSION STUDY, VOL. II ANALYSIS
    - wumeow 2y ago
      I’m talking specifically about the claim that there was a secret study tandem to the zinc cadmium sulfide one that was testing a new type of nuclear weapon on the population. The dissertation doesn’t refer to any of its sources or references for this claim.
  - odyssey7 2y ago
    Admittedly, I couldn't find a precise source used by the dissertation stating that "biological simulants" other zinc cadmium sulfide were sprayed specifically on St. Louis. One of the references isn't available online. It might also have been a source that was overlooked in the references. Anyway, it's 2024 now, and more information has come to light. Martino-Taylor's 2011 belief has been confirmed. US News reported [1] on the situation as recently as September 2023, quoting a member of the House of Representatives acknowledging that it really did happen: "Democratic U.S. Rep. Cori Bush of St. Louis said in a statement that she and her staff "are currently looking into alternative pathways that the federal government can take to ensure those impacted by the spraying of radioactive compounds and biochemicals in Pruitt-Igoe are also addressed.”" [1] https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2023-09-24/government-should-pay-compensation-for-secretive-cold-war-era-testing-st-louis-victims-say https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2023-09-24/governmen...
kjkjadksj 2y ago
Don’t worry, they uses biological tracers too in the Bay Area: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray

by wumeow 2y ago

No, the aerosol was zinc cadmium sulfide. It wasn’t testing of biological and chemical weapons, it was testing of a simulant to model how those weapons would disperse through a city.

odyssey7 2y ago

The official story was that the aerosols were "biological simulants." If the official story could have gotten away with zinc cadmium sulfide, it would have. Page 69: "The St. Louis study may have involved far more than biological “simulants”, per the official military talking point. There is indication of a secret study conducted in tandem to the “official” military-sponsored St. Louis aerosol study. The second study, which for some reason warrants even more secrecy than its parallel study, appears to have been connected to a new type of deadly nuclear weapon, one of many being developed by the coalition, to be tested on unsuspecting residents of St. Louis"

wumeow 2y ago
What kind of indication? The dissertation offers no evidence for this, just vibes.
- Jimmc414 2y ago
  Are you looking at the 2 page abstract or 837 page full dissertation? The latter is well documented with references and corroborating FOIA responses. [0] https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/13170/research.pdf https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/13... See: APPENDIX B: ST. LOUIS 1953 ZnCdS DISPERSION DATA APPENDIX C: PENETRATION OF BUILDINGS IN ST. LOUIS APPENDIX D: SYNOPSIS OF FINDINGS: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING OFFICE'S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HUMAN TISSUE ANALYSIS APPENDIX E: TIMELINE OF EVENTS APPENDIX F: FOIA RESPONSE- ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND APPENDIX G: FOIA RESPONSE- DUGWAY PROVING GROUND: BEHAVIOR OF AEROSOL CLOUDS WITHIN CITIES & ST. LOUIS DISPERSION STUDY, VOL. II ANALYSIS
  - wumeow 2y ago
    I’m talking specifically about the claim that there was a secret study tandem to the zinc cadmium sulfide one that was testing a new type of nuclear weapon on the population. The dissertation doesn’t refer to any of its sources or references for this claim.
- odyssey7 2y ago
  Admittedly, I couldn't find a precise source used by the dissertation stating that "biological simulants" other zinc cadmium sulfide were sprayed specifically on St. Louis. One of the references isn't available online. It might also have been a source that was overlooked in the references. Anyway, it's 2024 now, and more information has come to light. Martino-Taylor's 2011 belief has been confirmed. US News reported [1] on the situation as recently as September 2023, quoting a member of the House of Representatives acknowledging that it really did happen: "Democratic U.S. Rep. Cori Bush of St. Louis said in a statement that she and her staff "are currently looking into alternative pathways that the federal government can take to ensure those impacted by the spraying of radioactive compounds and biochemicals in Pruitt-Igoe are also addressed.”" [1] https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2023-09-24/government-should-pay-compensation-for-secretive-cold-war-era-testing-st-louis-victims-say https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2023-09-24/governmen...

kjkjadksj 2y ago

Don’t worry, they uses biological tracers too in the Bay Area: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray