Could you please help me to find a strongman interpretation of idealism? The question i am primarily interested in, is: "whether there exists a Turing machine,

Could you please help me to find a strongman interpretation of idealism? The question i am primarily interested in, is: "whether there exists a Turing machine, output of which is indistinguishable from behavior of a human". This is a purely abstract, mathematical question and should be in the purview of science. As far as i understand the answer to this question given by Idealism is that 1. it is not possible, and 2. when it is done it will still be impossible because despite behaving 100% the same as a human it will be something entirely different (a philosophical zombie), because 1 is true by definition. Perhaps the confusion arises because we are just talking about different things? And you are not interested in either behavior of this kind of Turing machine, or in detailed description of physics of matter in the brain? > Quantum nonlocality was demonstrated experimentally and people won the Nobel prize for it There are still many interpretations possible, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ER_%3D_EPR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ER_%3D_EPR or the interpretation proposed by Wolfram Physics project (which i rather like), which keeps local realism, but locality is not on R3 but on a graph.