4 ms·
This is specifically covered in cases like Midler v. Ford, and legally it matters what the use is for. If it's for parody/etc it's completely different from att
by codemac 2y ago
This is specifically covered in cases like Midler v. Ford, and legally it matters what the use is for. If it's for parody/etc it's completely different from attempting to impersonate and convince customers it is someone else.
- tim333 2y agoMidler v. Ford is a bit different from CahtGPT in that it was about a direct copy of a Midler song for a car ad, not just a voice sounding similar saying different stuff. You can hear them here: Midler version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFVhL0jbutU&t=22s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFVhL0jbutU&t=22s Car ad https://youtu.be/hxShNrpdVRs https://youtu.be/hxShNrpdVRs
- QuantumGood 2y agoOne of male voice actor contractors impersonated Julia Childs for a commercial years ago, writing was in a parodying style. She sued and won.