Even if it is non-crank... how did Nature editors allow such non- scientific wording to go through? Ever since Deep mind serially publishes shit Nature article

Even if it is non-crank... how did Nature editors allow such non- scientific wording to go through? Ever since Deep mind serially publishes shit Nature article with close to zero reproducibility, many gaps, close to no section on related work (and therefore no credit assignment to previous authors on whose work they built) -the AlphaGeometry paper comes to mind- I'm wondering whether Nature simply has abandoned it's status and is devolving from a flagship journal toma crackpot journal ...