> Google has produced a number of quite good tools. "Quite good" is exactly the wording that I would have used too. But Go's tooling is _really_ good; the lang

> Google has produced a number of quite good tools. "Quite good" is exactly the wording that I would have used too. But Go's tooling is _really_ good; the language itself is, well, "quite good". And is still supported and actively developed!