5 ms·
I read it before I became a daily reader of HN. I always thought and still think it's a great book. It may miss some writer's instruments to make it "a good bo
by kmarc 2y ago
I read it before I became a daily reader of HN.
I always thought and still think it's a great book. It may miss some writer's instruments to make it "a good book" in the classical sense, but to me it wasn't missing at all.
If anyone here neglects this book due to being a "sci-fi booksthat HN recommends", please give it a try!
- jimmydddd 2y agoI was a huge Asimov fan as a kid. Re-reading some of my favorites, I noticed they lacked a lot of classical "good book" elements. But they are still great in their own way.