3 ms·

https://drewdevault.com/2024/04/09/2024-04-09-FDO-conduct-enforcement.html https://drewdevault.com/2024/04/09/2024-04-09-FDO-conduct-en... This is a pretty goo

• jorvi 2y ago
  That is not an overview. An overview would show both sides. I’m not saying Vaxry is right or did nothing wrong, or that Drew’s portrayal is wrong, but what you linked is just Drew’s personal musings on the situation. I’ve seen someone be viciously attacked online for being bigoted against people who are less mentally able, only for it to surface after the attacks (and professional consequences) that the “bigotry” was calling someone a moron a few times. Be careful about taking sides when you have only one side of the story. Not long ago HN harassed a Google employee for supposedly stealing a JavaScript accessibility project, only for it to later come to light that the accuser was dealing with some difficult personal situations that caused him to portray the entire thing lopsidedly.
  • xyzzy_plugh 2y ago
    Nah. You don't have to show both sides when the evidence is stacked. We don't have to publicize the criminal's take when they're unanimously, unambiguously convicted of murder. It's one thing if there is ambiguity, and the collective opinion is undecided, but that's not the case here. Drew's personal musings on the situation form a reasonable overview in this case. Even a fraction of the evidence publicized is enough to justify the label "toxic."
• snvzz 2y ago
  Drew has been seen commenting (very unnecessarily) on Hyprland's code quality or lack thereof. I see a wm's main developer attacking a developer of another wm, and it's not pretty.