3 ms·
In many ways, it would make more sense to use a leading 1 for A.D. years instead of a leading 0. This way, 1984 would become 11984, and the year when Caesar die
by bumbledraven 2y ago
In many ways, it would make more sense to use a leading 1 for A.D. years instead of a leading 0. This way, 1984 would become 11984, and the year when Caesar died, 44 B.C. (which is astronomical year –43) would be the year 09957. With this system, which is known as the Holocene calendar, we can specify any year during the period of history for which we know actual year numbers without having to distinguish between B.C. and A.D. (and deal with quirky off-by-one errors due to skipping the year 0) or use negative numbers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- navane 2y agoThat's the dumbest shit I read today, but I just woke up. Changing one arbitrary date for another. There where humans and civilizations 12kya (kilo years ago). I much prefer the 'kya' notation. It doesn't matter if you're 50 years off when taking about things 8kya.