4 ms·
As someone who's had an sbcl process running for just over a year on one box, I disagree. xmonad is probably just a turd.
by gouranga 14y ago
As someone who's had an sbcl process running for just over a year on one box, I disagree.
xmonad is probably just a turd.
- AlisdairO 14y agoSo what, in the future you're relying on everyone to magically start coding well?
- snprbob86 14y agoDon't we already expect that from kernel contributors? :-P
- heretohelp 14y agoSo we're going to expect this from the entirety of userspace?
- gouranga 14y agoNo userspace can be wrapped quite nicely: In fact we don't really need processes, just suitable environments set up for execution of code. For example, stop a lisp definition calling eval: (defun no-eval-wrapper (form) (let ((eval nil)) (form))) I've not tried this btw and it'll probably only work with scheme dialects.