5 ms·
Election year. They know the judges won't let anything bad happen to their friends so they can pretend to act tough every four years (when the billionaire clas
by willcipriano 2y ago
Election year.
They know the judges won't let anything bad happen to their friends so they can pretend to act tough every four years (when the billionaire class's preferred candidate/party is in office of course).
- __loam 2y agoI don't understand people like you. A government agency does something material to help the consumer and you just shit talk and resort to base cynicism. Nothing would ever change if everyone was as apathetic as you are.
- willcipriano 2y ago> something material That's the trick. What material thing happened? Over the years, hundreds of thousands (?) of people have been ripped off. If I did that I'd be in jail.
- __loam 2y agoAnti-trust has a proven record of making things less shit. It doesn't work if you don't use it, obviously. Courts are unfortunately not built for your instant gratification.
- llamaimperative 2y agoCynicism helps people feel smart, when in many cases it actually just reveals their immense ignorance (such as this case).
- kylebenzle 2y agoIn this case ticketmaster is a scape goat by design so artists can charge whatever they want.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- llamaimperative 2y agoAnd what bearing does that have on the discussion at hand?
- wumeow 2y agoThis is actually supported by evidence: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167218783195 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167218783195
- willcipriano 2y agoSo is my theory for what its worth: https://act.represent.us/sign/problempoll-fba https://act.represent.us/sign/problempoll-fba The US as a democracy isn't supported by evidence.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- __loam 2y agoGiving up on your democratic representation is not going to make things better.
- willcipriano 2y agoWhat democratic representation? > “The preferences of the average American appear to have only a miniscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”
- __loam 2y agoYeah that's what happens when over 40% of the voting public gives up like you. No representation.
- vsnf 2y agoThis defeatist attitude is unhelpful. Are you prepared to lose nearly everything come November? What will you do when the dictatorship looms over you, will you accept your dwindling freedoms? What would cause you to actually stand up for yourself and fight for a better future? I see this attitude espoused a lot and I wonder if any of the people who say so will just roll over and accept a creeping totalitarianism with a shrug. Is there literally anything at all that you'd be proactive about? If you have causes you are passionate about but you refuse to participate in the (hard won, bloodily won) civic right of voting, then your ability to affect those causes will evaporate. No matter how much you think your government doesn't care now, they will care even less when it is truly, wholly, dictatorially unaccountable to you. And then what? What was your anti-voting stance for? A substantial chunk of the electorate seems to prefer losing and then whining about outcomes as long as it allows them to pat themselves on the back for 'staying above it all and seeing the futility all along'. I implore you instead to care, hold your officials accountable, and vote. A bad future is not inevitable.
- refurb 2y agoOr, they've lived on enough to see the impact of regulation go wrong.
- llamaimperative 2y agoLike good design, good regulation becomes invisible. Actual wisdom is recognizing and counteracting that bias.
- refurb 2y agoAll regulation has a cost. And if based on the track record of the US government, it tends to be high and even potentially introduce weird incentives that solve one problem but create two more.
- llamaimperative 2y agoLack of regulation has costs too. I’m open to your argument if you can demonstrate somehow what “tends” to be true. I suspect you can’t, and neither can I, which is why we should assess regulations on a case by case basis of their own merits instead of totally unsupportable “regulation good” or “regulation bad” maxims.
- ryandrake 2y agoWhen it comes to holding corporations accountable for their actions, very little actually does ever change. Our entire system treats business/corporations with kid gloves, and it's not a partisan issue that will change with a different party in control.
- kylebenzle 2y agoNo one is doing anything to help the consumer. Artists set their ticket prices, tickmaster is a middleman/scape goat. Pretending to go after the scapegoat is just for show.
- fshbbdssbbgdd 2y agoDOJ has been filing aggressive antitrust cases throughout the Biden administration’s tenure. If you want to be conspiratorial, you can point to their losing record in court and argue they know the cases will fail, but “it’s an election year” doesn’t make sense. I think the realistic take is the people at DOJ are legitimately enacting the strongest antitrust enforcement they can get away with (and then some).
- nickff 2y agoThe FTC leadership has made a number of strange (and in my opinion poor) decisions, beginning with insulting and alienating the agency staff, which had experience that the political appointees lacked. They then proceeded to act without regard to previous agency experience. At this point, it seems like they’re just trying to get their political goals back on track, though it seems a bit late, given that administrations are generally most effective at their beginnings.
- dpkirchner 2y ago> insulting and alienating the agency staff What are you referring to here?
- nickff 2y agohttps://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2024-02-22%20Abuse%20of%20Power%20Waste%20of%20Resources%20and%20Fear_0.pdf https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-j... There is a great deal of documentation and discussion, but this document covers some of it, here are a couple of on-topic quotes: >"Documents from and testimony by FTC managers show that Chair Khan marginalized the litigators and investigators at the FTC who had the skills necessary to win cases." >"One manager consulted with his team and reported to the Chief of Staff that Chair Khan was “[s]capegoating the career staff for the FTC’s ‘underenforcement’ of the antitrust laws”26 and “contributing to an external narrative that denigrates staff.”"
- 2y ago
- ehsankia 2y agohttps://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-apple-monopolizing-smartphone-markets https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-apple... https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-google-monopolizing-digital-advertising-technologies https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-googl... https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/09/ftc-sues-amazon-illegally-maintaining-monopoly-power https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/09/... It's been nonstop for the whole duration of the admin.