4 ms·
Sure and anyone who has worked in a toxic workplace knows exactly what it means to require a direct path to leadership to resolve an issue instead of just resol
by pempem 2y ago
Sure and anyone who has worked in a toxic workplace knows exactly what it means to require a direct path to leadership to resolve an issue instead of just resolving it.
- Terr_ 2y agoI also notice he conditions it on "any former employee." What about current employees who may be affected by the same legalese? Either way, I can imagine a subtext of "step forward and get a target on your back."
- tedivm 2y agoCurrent employees rarely sign exit agreements, since by exiting they stop being employees.
- Terr_ 2y agoTrue, they can't renegotiate agreements that don't yet exist. However the fact that the corporate leadership could even make those threats to not-yet-departed employees indicates that something is already broken or missing in the legal relationship with current ones. A simple example might for the company to clearly state in their handbook--for all current employees--that vested shares cannot be clawed back.