LLMs are famously bad at math. It's one of the prototypical examples of problems they can't solve. Yet it's the prime example presented here. So I am curious,

LLMs are famously bad at math. It's one of the prototypical examples of problems they can't solve. Yet it's the prime example presented here. So I am curious, is Gates suggesting that we will overcome the fundamental issues here or is he saying that (which is kind of interesting in itself) it's plausible to have a technology that is fundamentally bad at something, be an effective teacher of that thing to others?