3 ms·

"My company bought their product" does not sound like material non-public information. It certainly doesn't sound material (and for this reason I also think it

"My company bought their product" does not sound like material non-public information. It certainly doesn't sound material (and for this reason I also think it was sheer dumb luck that the investment paid off so handsomely, rather than intimate knowledge of the business).

jldugger 2y ago
It's absolutely treated as insider info by policy where I work. It might not rise to SEC enforcement action, but if caught you probably won't have a job anymore...
- kortilla 2y ago
  “Violated company policy” is a completely different thing from anything the SEC cares about.
- SkipperCat 2y ago
  Why would your employer care what you invested in? How would they be impacted if you bought or sold public stock of someone they interact with? Would they care if you traded Google, Apple, Microsoft or Oracle? I think most employers wouldn't care at all.
  - georgeburdell 2y ago
    It matters if you’re in a position, no matter how small, to influence your employer’s dealings with the companies you’re invested in.
  - jldugger 2y ago
    One possible explanation is that we require this of our vendors and suppliers, and the easiest way to achieve that is by making it reciprocal. The actual policy wording: > No Third-Party Trading or Tipping. Do not trade in the securities of another company when aware of material nonpublic information about that company in connection with your work at ******. This includes trading in the stock of ****** suppliers, manufacturers, vendors, or customers, such as cellular network carriers or other channel partners. You must also not tip material nonpublic information about another company.