> Verifiably false. Go ahead, you could have just come forward with the source. > By the standards of any person from the outside of the bubble noticing how e

> Verifiably false. Go ahead, you could have just come forward with the source. > By the standards of any person from the outside of the bubble noticing how each new layer of doublethink and denial gets cemented with a thick layers of childishly fundamentalist slogans of "democracy vs tyranny", that become ever less credible. Right, so now try a sentence with some content. > What's actually ironic is the uncanny resemblance to good old communism and the way that every discussion could simply be shut down or reality denied by pointing out a "superior moral framework". Who is shutting down discussion based on "superior moral framework" grounds? Who is claiming moral superiority? You know, you don't need to have moral supremacy to point out the Russian regime corrupt morals. You don't need to be a "Western" country to see that. Is Khakstan a Western country? Is Armenia a Western country? Is Mongolia a Western country? Why have 191 countries out of 193 refused to recognize Russian sham referendums on occupied territories and their attempt at annexation? Are they all moral supremacists with layers of double thinking and thick layers of childishly fundamentalist slogans? Perhaps, just perhaps, Russian corruption and mistreatment of its neighbors, and their incapacity of having a proper foreign policy to the point of only having 1 country in Europe aligned with Russia - and it's a propped-up regime enforced by Russia led by Lukashenko, who fled to Turkey (a NATO country) the moment the Wagner Military Coup started. So yet again, very typical of Russian propagandists, you managed to write 4 sentences without saying jack sht.