(Edit: I forgot a third relevant point) I am not sure I get exactly what you are pointing to, but synthetic logical answers are: -- the lucidity after the fev

(Edit: I forgot a third relevant point) I am not sure I get exactly what you are pointing to, but synthetic logical answers are: -- the lucidity after the fever, and -- striving to implement what was missed. Plus, -- understanding why what somehow works does work, and build knowledge on that. For the first: LLMs will be placed in dangerous places as flexible but improper frameworks as a practice that will be deprecated by the community, and will in parallel be implemented in the places where they actually fit (we discussed a few possibility yesterday in these pages, for example). For the second: the implementation of artificial morons (some handfuls of months ago) makes the "real thing" - something that reasons, that thinks organically, that criticizes its own contents, that is reliable - more missed, so more investment will be done towards that progress. For the third: research will continue exploring why LLMs can produce surprising results (that some have linked to "scale"); knowledge built in this effort will eventually lead to progress. Meanwhile, real needs will be tackled by businesses. (If you can clarify what I missed in the question, please do.)