4 ms·
Nobody (apart from the dolt who wrote this anyway) is arguing he or Swift or anyone else doesn't have a reason to travel. You don't need a reason. That said, in
by ToucanLoucan 2y ago
Nobody (apart from the dolt who wrote this anyway) is arguing he or Swift or anyone else doesn't have a reason to travel. You don't need a reason. That said, in times such as ours when we're all being told via our media and legislation passed that we need to be more eco-friendly, it's a slap in the face (and I'll say, it's 2 slaps from Musk who's fortune has been greatly bolstered by AMPLE Federal subsidies for green industry!) that they can't take a regular goddamn airplane like anyone else. Planes are ATROCIOUS for emissions simply by virtue of how a jet engine works and, at least right now, it's pretty clear that public opinion leans towards it's unethical to use such machines so frivolously.
- lolinder 2y ago> Nobody's arguing he or Swift or anyone else doesn't have a reason to travel The article literally says that Musk did not have a "pretty good reason to travel a lot last year": > unlike someone like Musk, Swift actually had a pretty good reason to travel a lot last year
- ToucanLoucan 2y agoFixed.
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agocommercial planes are actually better per mile on emissions than most cars (around 100mpg per person). private jets of course are way worse though.