Removing those that progressed out of the pay scale feels especially odd? That should be seen as a success of employment for this, no? I'm also not a fan of f

Removing those that progressed out of the pay scale feels especially odd? That should be seen as a success of employment for this, no? I'm also not a fan of focusing the headline or finding on a single company without a cohort to compare against. If anything, this would punish individual companies for hiring low income people at all. Easy to have 0% here if you just refuse to hire anyone that qualifies, after all. And that is a terrible goal. If I'm off on any of that, happy to be corrected.