2 ms·
I'm not so sure of that. It appears that the land had an easement for access which transfers on sale. > The land was served by a road easement at the time it
by lesuorac 2y ago
I'm not so sure of that.
It appears that the land had an easement for access which transfers on sale.
> The land was served by a road easement at the time it was purchased by the state. An underlying landowner sued asserting that the easement was insufficient to permit park visitor travel between Pennington Road and the park, and lost. The court determined that the easement was sufficient to allow visitor use
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutter_Buttes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutter_Buttes
https://casetext.com/case/campbell-v-state-1088 https://casetext.com/case/campbell-v-state-1088
- s1artibartfast 2y agoThat makes makes sense, so there is limited access, but not permissive for open public access.