The article made me smile by how much disconnected to reality it is: - kids give their assignments to AI so that it solves it for them, not for getting a hint.

The article made me smile by how much disconnected to reality it is: - kids give their assignments to AI so that it solves it for them, not for getting a hint. - it has long been demonstrated human interaction is required to learn difficult things (such as reading/writing), otherwise kids would learn those skills on video. - learning is about practicing difficult stuff. AI is about having the computer doing difficult stuff for you. "Employees who can use AI effectively will be far more valuable than those who can’t." The point of AI is that there is absolutely nothing to do for it to digest your problem. Show me someone who can't use AI? Must be illiterate? "jobs of the future—which will become more enjoyable and fulfilling" ... finding and fixing the errors the AI made. My parents are much better at counting with no calculator than my kids. Mental calculation is no more seen as a valuable skill now that everybody effectively has a calculator in his pocket (smartphone). AI will make some skills once valuable obsolete. The question is not how are we going to teach with AI but WHAT are we going to teach?