3 ms·
you didnt answer the question about what "the damage" is. It is a simple question. Instead, you evaded it and tried to redirect the topic.
by s1artibartfast 2y ago
you didnt answer the question about what "the damage" is. It is a simple question.
Instead, you evaded it and tried to redirect the topic.
- ta1243 2y agoThe use of the land is removed from the people
- s1artibartfast 2y agoSo the damage is opportunity loss. What makes it a legitimate grievance opposed to a bogus one? There are lots things that were once possible, but no longer are. Of course, there is also the question of who "the people" are.
- hansjorg 2y agoI already explained what I meant by damage. Being unable to see how the freedom of a tiny minority shouldn't trump the freedom of basic modes of being of the vast majority, that's damage.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoWhat are "freedoms of basic modes of being"? Is there a lexicon guide I should be referencing with definitions to these vague phrases.