Property rights doesn’t have to be bogus for the right to roam to exist. Can you develop random land under the right to roam? No, that remain the exclusive rig

Property rights doesn’t have to be bogus for the right to roam to exist. Can you develop random land under the right to roam? No, that remain the exclusive right of the owner. Same goes for logging, farming, and depending on legislature a whole heap of other benefits to owning land. That doesn’t mean your country has to acknowledge a right to roam, it’s ultimately up to all legislatures to decide where to draw its lines. None of those lines are self-evident, though it doesn’t matter which rights the land owner cares to acknowledge, as that is the prerogative of the legislator.