4 ms·
Interesting! I wonder how this could be applied to a Rails project (since that's what ruby is most used for). For example how would it know to test a wide selec
by jack_riminton 2y ago
Interesting! I wonder how this could be applied to a Rails project (since that's what ruby is most used for). For example how would it know to test a wide selection of possible values for different variables if they're not explicitly set up?
- Alifatisk 2y ago> Rails [...] that's what ruby is most used for I wish that wasn't the case, I use Ruby heavily for gluing different systems together.
- mikepurvis 2y agoOutside of language level preferences, is there something about the ecosystem around Ruby that makes it particularly well suited to this? I would have thought Python was the glue language winner just because there are already bindings to the entire universe available for it.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- portpecos 2y agoRuby just simply isn’t the glue language winner because of the heavy emphasis on rails. From a systems perspective, I had to switch to python because it has pyroute2, which supports rtnl, devlink, ethtool and more. I would have thought ruby had a full-fledged netlink library right now considering the stability of chef and puppet. But all I could find was this from 8 years ago: https://github.com/BytemarkHosting/netlinkrb https://github.com/BytemarkHosting/netlinkrb I started off with ruby for systems glue but now I have a mix of python and ruby. I wish it was all ruby but the lack of updated “glue gems” and the prevalence of updated “glue eggs” means python really is the “glue language winner”.
- Alifatisk 2y ago> all I could find was this from 8 years ago: https://github.com/BytemarkHosting/netlinkrb https://github.com/BytemarkHosting/netlinkrb Yeah, that's so typical. I've almost become used to this, seeing useful gems being very old. To me, I see that as either abandoned (which means I have to fork it and polish it) or the gem is considered complete.
- sam2426679 2y ago> I wish it was all ruby Why do you not wish it was all Python?
- ilvez 2y agoMy answer to this would be: This is totally personal, but for me Ruby is just a language that allows concisely and readable way express myself to get stuff done. Python just does not read so good and forces to do more boiler-plate. Probably skill-issue, but I knew Python before Ruby, so :shrug: To give out any examples, I would need to have some Python code on me, but I don't :D
- Alifatisk 2y agoI’d say simply because of language preference
- Alifatisk 2y agoRuby is my choice primarily because of its syntax and the powerful meta-programming capabilities. The ecosystem in itself is not any richer or better than Python, no, Python has faaar superior libraries and vibrant support. In my case, I've found ruby-toolbox.com to be useful when I need to scavenge for libraries.
- parentheses 2y agoI imagine it wouldn't be too hard to build up your own data generators for Rails models (or other entities).
- ohbarye 2y agoYeah, the easiest way is to generate attributes and instantiate any Rails model like the one below: Pbt.assert do Pbt.property(name: Pbt.printable_string, age: Pbt.integer(min: 0, max: 100)) do |name:, age:| user = User.new(name: name, age: age) # write your test here end end
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]