3 ms·
Wow, such negativity. > There's no spacecraft-related reason to select this—it's strictly worse—it's just the US/EU are in a decades-long ongoing shortage of P
by outworlder 2y ago
Wow, such negativity.
> There's no spacecraft-related reason to select this—it's strictly worse—it's just the US/EU are in a decades-long ongoing shortage of Pu-238, and this is the only available alternative. I don't think this is "pioneering" in any positive sense of the word. IMHO, it's embarrassing.
No, but there are practical reasons to select this. It doesn't matter _why_ Pu-238 is unavailable, it matters that it is unavailable and this has been a heavy constraint on space missions. New Horizons almost got postponed (with a danger of cancellation) due to this. And even then it launched with 80% fuel.
The question is, can they deliver americium RTGs ? That would be great.
- ApolloFortyNine 2y ago>It doesn't matter _why_ Pu-238 is unavailable Why not exactly? Because we used to buy it from Russia because we stopped making it ourselves? Anyways they reference here that it's expected to finally increase production to a reasonable amount soon. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-238 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-238
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]