3 ms·

I think OP was referring to enclosures

• deepsun 2y ago
  Yep, my point is that owner is owner. Owner can give some rights (e.g. to roam), but owner can take them away (to enclose). But I don't argue whether it's good or bad. I personally don't even know if land ownership is a good thing to begin with. On the other end of range is Communism, that I've experienced personally, and choosing between the two evils I'd choose Monarchy. Probably some middle ground, like land can be leased from government for max 50-99 year at a market price. Or like with the right to roam -- land is owned forever, but government highly restricts the definition of "ownership".