3 ms·
THe value of a college degree is signaling. Your ability to graduate college signals to future employers that you have some combination of intelligence and wor
by miki123211 2y ago
THe value of a college degree is signaling.
Your ability to graduate college signals to future employers that you have some combination of intelligence and work ethics. The more prestigious the institution, the stronger this signal is.
At the top end of the scale, it's not even about course difficulty but admission requirements. A lot more people would be able to graduate from Harvard if given a place than can actually get into Harvard, legacy admissions who are still able to graduate being the perfect proof of this. There's research that shows that Harvard courses aren't that much more difficult than those at other, far less prestigious universities, but the admission requirements are far stricter.
This phenomenon is a self-perpetuating feedback loop. If your average college graduate is slightly smarter than a non-graduate, employers will prefer graduates over non-graduates, as it's an easy thing to check. People notice how much of an advantage the college graduates have, so in the next generation, even more people choose college over other paths. This makes the gap between graduates and non-graduates even wider, which makes employers favor them more, which makes life harder for non-graduates, which causes even more people to go to college, and so it goes.
At the top end, other things start to matter, it's advantageous for smart kids to mix and network with rich kids and vice versa, hence legacy admissions, but this is what matters for most graduates.
- alephnerd 2y ago> THe value of a college degree is signaling. It really isn't. If so, why the hell do UC Berkeley, SJSU, and UIUC CS grads outcompete Dartmouth grads in YC, Entrepreneurship in general, or the tech industry? Yes Harvard-type programs are exclusive, but they do not open that many more doors in our industry than a CalPoly or UW or Cal undergrad would have. And the college advantage goes away very fast with 4-5 years of work experience. I don't need code monkeys. Learning to code isn't a big deal. If that's all I needed, I'll just contract to Infosys or EPAM. What I and other employers need are CRITICAL THINKERS - people who can think on their feet about both technical and business problems. This requires building that critical thinking muscle. Some people learn that out in the wild, but a lot don't, and college is the first place they learn to build that muscle. College is also one of the first places you learn that you can't coast - for every grade inflating Harvard, there are 10 grade deflating UCs or public universities. We shouldn't put barriers for hard working people who have self taught themselves the ins and outs of the industry, but we shouldn't conversely automatically shit on the entire concept of tertiary education.