3 ms·
This case only became severe because they chose to award these money to compilated work with no attribution. If they didn't reward this specific work it would b
by thriftwy 2y ago
This case only became severe because they chose to award these money to compilated work with no attribution. If they didn't reward this specific work it would be a non-issue. So by induction blame lies on the offering part.
Doing subpar work is not stealing. Come on, we've been through "intellectual property" already and now this.
- Xelbair 2y agoyou are doing some heavy mental gymnastics right now. What he did was a crime, reward or not, and he should be old enough to understand why that was immoral and possible consequences of it. aren't you affiliated with him somehow?
- thriftwy 2y ago> What he did was a crime No! It wasn't. I'll bet no court will agree with you. Next question.