4 ms·
From a quick scan, it sounds like you re-invented a lot of the concepts of semantic data, just with different terminology and a different text format. (RDF, tri
by the_duke 2y ago
From a quick scan, it sounds like you re-invented a lot of the concepts of semantic data, just with different terminology and a different text format. (RDF, triples, ...)
- 0x445442 2y agoI wish there was a defacto/canonical site that housed free papers that people could go search before embarking on these types of efforts. Perhaps there is but when I attempt these types of searches I get directed to pay walled ACM type links or Github "Papers We Love" type links.
- breck 2y agoYou might enjoy https://pldb.io/ https://pldb.io/, which is a paywall free, open source, public domain, database you can browse completely locally, with information on all of these kinds of prior languages. :)
- mynotaccount 2y agosci-hub
- sleno 2y agoFunny, someone linked me here. I just posted a project that got a bit of traction related to this: papertalk.xyz
- breck 2y agoIt would certainly be fair to add RDF/triples/semantic web, to prior work. I spent many years exploring that stuff. We are aiming at roughly the same problem. Our implementation has solved some important details.
- FabHK 2y agoMight be worth highlighting some of the problems solved (particularly those that earlier ideas haven't).